Industrial building or factory project
Owners, architects and general planners receive logistics input before docks, shafts, floor loads, clear heights, fire compartments, staging areas, vertical transport or expansion reserves are fixed.
Basel, Switzerland · Intralogistics · Factory logistics · Warehouse automation
Intralogistics planning for industrial buildings, automation and system interfaces
Tidira supports industrial and life-science projects when material flows, building requirements, automation scope and system responsibilities need to be clarified before design, tender or implementation decisions become difficult to change.
Architecture interfaces · GMP logistics · ASRS/AKL · KLT/Eurobox · ERP/WMS/WCS/MES · FAT/SAT/SIT/UAT
13+ years · Basel · Switzerland/DACH · selected international projects · ASRS/AKL, AMR, conveyor technology · ERP/WMS/WCS/MES interfaces
Where Tidira enters the project
The logistics risk usually starts early: when spaces, routes, automation assumptions and system responsibilities are set before the operating evidence is clear. Tidira brings the logistics view into the project while the decisions are still changeable.
Automation or ASRS/AKL concept
The operator receives a neutral baseline for storage, picking, production supply, returns, load carriers, performance and expansion before suppliers shape the solution.
GMP, sensitive components or high-value parts
Material status, cleanliness, ESD, handling classes, inlays, labels, washing loops and qualification evidence are translated into practical logistics requirements.
System ownership and acceptance readiness
ERP, SAP EWM, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, WMS, WCS, MFS/MFC, MES, labels, handling units, confirmations and exceptions are assigned before tests expose the gaps.
How Tidira structures the work
The output is prepared for workshops, tenders and gate decisions — not for generic process documentation.
-
Establish the operating baseline
Flows, volumes, load carriers, handling rules, constraints and non-negotiables are captured so they can be reviewed and decided.
-
Translate logistics into spaces and interfaces
Material flow becomes input for areas, routes, docks, shafts, automation footprints, system handovers and supplier scopes.
-
Assign system and supplier responsibility
Responsibilities across operations, IT, automation suppliers, quality and building planning are made explicit before assumptions harden.
-
Prepare tests and acceptance
FAT, SAT, SIT, UAT, cutover, training, issue ownership and acceptance evidence are structured around operating reality.
Selected project situations
Experience is shown through anonymised project situations: material-flow questions, automation concepts, building interfaces, system boundaries and acceptance risks that recur in complex industrial projects.
Clarify the next logistics planning step.
Send the project phase, site context and the planning question that needs a clear answer. Fabian Ecker replies directly with a practical next step.